Re: Locals revisited

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Locals revisited
De : no.email (at) *nospam* nospam.invalid (Paul Rubin)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 27. Mar 2025, 22:41:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87v7ruduci.fsf@nightsong.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
There is the E subspecification of the RISC-V specification with 16
registers.  I don't know if anybody has implemented this.

The CH32V003 uses it and is of some interest as a Forth target.  It has
16k of flash and 2k of ram.

https://www.cnx-software.com/2022/10/22/10-cents-ch32v003-risc-v-mcu-offers-2kb-sram-16kb-flash-in-sop8-to-qfn20-packages/

More efficient in code size.  In instruction execution, typically the
same speed.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3578360.3580261 indicates some minor
speed differences, not always favorable.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Mar 25 * Locals revisited12albert
26 Mar 25 `* Re: Locals revisited11Paul Rubin
27 Mar 25  +* Re: Locals revisited2mhx
27 Mar 25  i`- Stacks (was: Locals revisited)1Anton Ertl
27 Mar 25  +* Re: Locals revisited4Anton Ertl
27 Mar 25  i+- Re: Locals revisited1albert
27 Mar 25  i`* Re: Locals revisited2Paul Rubin
28 Mar 25  i `- Re: Locals revisited1Anton Ertl
28 Mar 25  `* Re: Locals revisited4dxf
30 Mar 25   `* Re: Locals revisited3dxf
30 Mar 25    `* Re: Locals revisited2dxf
31 Mar 25     `- Re: Locals revisited1sjack

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal