Sujet : Re: Locals revisited
De : sjack (at) *nospam* dontemail.me (sjack)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 31. Mar 2025, 16:01:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vseao9$ijao$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.8.0-56-generic (x86_64))
dxf <
dxforth@gmail.com> wrote:
The question then is can HEX: DEC: be justified. While you might because
CO exists, I'm not sure I could.
Toad extension:
-- BHEX ( R: -> base -- )
-- HEX Back Trek
-- save BASE
-- Trek: set HEX
-- Back: restore BASE
: BHEX PRO
BASE @ >R
BACK R> BASE !
TREK HEX
CONT ;
: foo bhex . ;
100 dup
i. foo --> 64
i. . --> 100
:)
-- me
Locals revisited
Stacks (was: Locals revisited)