Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 21. Apr 2025, 06:20:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <7bacaec09cb8176cf6ae972c04937b0b93732afd@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/04/2025 11:25 pm, sjack wrote:
dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Really annoying was LMI which on error switched to DECIMAL ...
>
 
Someone here awhile back posted modifying LOAD and LIST to convert
the TOS number to decimal regardless of current BASE setting.
Gave it a try and found it indeed helpful.
...

Out of curiosity what was the conversion method?


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Mar 25 * "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"198Alexis
27 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5Martin Nicholas
28 Mar 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"4Alexis
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3Martin Nicholas
30 Mar 25 i  +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Alexis
30 Mar 25 i  `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Bernd Linsel
28 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"7anthk
29 Mar 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"6mhx
29 Mar 25 i +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
30 Mar 25 i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3anthk
5 Apr 25 i i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1anthk
6 Apr 25 i i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1sjack
31 Mar 25 i `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1John Ames
30 Mar 25 +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"86sjack
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"85dxf
29 Apr 25 i `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth84Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i  +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth80dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i+* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth77Hans Bezemer
1 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth76dxf
1 May 25 i  ii +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3John Doe
1 May 25 i  ii i+- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Stephen Pelc
1 May 25 i  ii i`- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Anton Ertl
1 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth72Hans Bezemer
2 May 25 i  ii  +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
3 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth70dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   +* QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)68Anton Ertl
3 May 25 i  ii   i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT65dxf
3 May 25 i  ii   ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT64Anton Ertl
4 May 25 i  ii   ii +* Re: QUIT and ABORT62dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT61Anton Ertl
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i +* Re: QUIT and ABORT54dxf
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT53Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i i +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i +* Re: QUIT and ABORT3dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT48dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  +* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  i+- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT44Anton Ertl
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT43dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i i    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT42Ruvim
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     +* Re: QUIT and ABORT40dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT39Ruvim
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT38dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT37Ruvim
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT36dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    +* Re: QUIT and ABORT2albert
10 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
9 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT33Ruvim
10 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i     +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
13 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT31Ruvim
14 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT30dxf
14 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT29Ruvim
15 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT28dxf
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i         `* Re: QUIT and ABORT27Ruvim
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i          `* Re: QUIT and ABORT26dxf
16 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i           `* Re: QUIT and ABORT25Ruvim
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i            `* Re: QUIT and ABORT24dxf
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i             `* Re: QUIT and ABORT23Ruvim
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i              `* Re: QUIT and ABORT22dxf
17 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i               `* Re: QUIT and ABORT21Ruvim
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                `* Re: QUIT and ABORT20dxf
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 +* Re: QUIT and ABORT2Anton Ertl
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                 `* Re: QUIT and ABORT17Ruvim
18 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT16dxf
19 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT15Ruvim
20 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT14dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT13Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +* Re: QUIT and ABORT7mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT5Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT4mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT4dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
25 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2dxf
26 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                         `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT5mhx
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i  +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3albert
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2minforth
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i    `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)1albert
5 May 25 i  ii   `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2sjack
1 May 25 i  i `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3albert
30 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i    `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1mhx
4 Apr 25 +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
5 Apr 25 `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"98dxf

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal