Sujet : Re: Words in Gforth manual undefined
De : papa (at) *nospam* sdf.org (David Meyer)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 10. May 2025, 02:17:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <874ixtz2lj.fsf@lucy.meyer21c.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
David Meyer <papa@sdf.org> writes:
The only thing that still mystifies me is why a seemingly basic word
like u/ wasn't added until so recently.
>
The standard has UM/MOD (and that has been in Gforth from the start)
if / does not satisfy your needs.
>
Actually IIRC we did not add U/ because of user demand, but mainly
because of implementation (speed of U/ vs UM/MOD on various CPUs) and
completeness considerations.
I see I should have read Starting Forth more carefully.
Thanks for the background on U/.
-- David MeyerTakarazuka, Japanpapa@sdf.org