Sujet : Re: SUBLEQ and EForth
De : anthk (at) *nospam* openbsd.home (anthk)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 17. May 2025, 06:59:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn102adau.qi8.anthk@openbsd.home.localhost>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (OpenBSD)
On 2025-05-14, Hans Bezemer <
the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14-05-2025 11:31, anthk wrote:
Run it as ./subleq ./subleq.dec
>
I can't - it complains:
>
$ pp4th -x subleq.4th < subleq.dec
Error: Not a 16-bit SUBLEQ VM
>
Hint - no, it's not YOUR subleq interpreter ;-)
>
Hans Bezemer
>
>
The Eforth code from the repo requires a 16 bit wide subleq machine.
Both subleq and muxleq (the last one it's much faster) in C
from Richard James Howe (same author) work seamlessly.
https://github.com/howerj/subleq/No, is not my interpreter, I barely expanded the Perl one for Muxleq
and it was just slightly faster but Perl had atrocious performance.
Even gawk (mawk ran really well) ran it much faster.
SUBLEQ and EForth
Re: SUBLEQ and EForth