Sujet : Re: The joy of OO
De : albert (at) *nospam* spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 27. May 2025, 10:16:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : KPN B.V.
Message-ID : <nnd$43a647fe$6655b43f@fb4d41c25d57ec01>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
10127r9$23us0$1@dont-email.me>, sjack <
sjack@dontemail.me> wrote:
albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
>
This holds Forth back. We absolutely need more than one method to get
anywhere.
>
A generation ago I explored using defining word to create object
with multiple methods; not an OO attempt, no class but just a useful
object. Such an object was "FPAD:" :
I don't advocate classes with the huge implication of inheritance
and polyformism either.
You can reasonably call a defining word to create object with multiple methods
a "class". I certainly wouldn't refrain from that.
<SNIP>
me
>
-- Temu exploits Christians: (Disclaimer, only 10 apostles)Last Supper Acrylic Suncatcher - 15Cm Round Stained Glass- Style WallArt For Home, Office And Garden Decor - Perfect For Windows, Bars,And Gifts For Friends Family And Colleagues.