Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"
De : commodorejohn (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Ames)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 28. May 2025, 15:56:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250528075641.000008f2@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 28 May 2025 04:02:19 -0000 (UTC)
legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) wrote:

Microcontrollers today have more resources than a PDP-11/70 from
1975.  As much as the appetite of the hardware has increased, the
appetite for features from customers has increased even further.

But then, the fewer resources consumed by the underlying framework, the
more are free for the actual application that meets those customer
needs. Of course there's a balance to be struck, but a spendthrift
attitude towards resources will, sooner or later, lead to a crunch that
might've been avoided otherwise.

(Things are also gonna get *real* interesting when Moore's Law finally
hits the wall with those pesky laws of physics that say things like "you
can't fit an infinite amount of stuff in a finite space without
creating a black hole" and "but also distance imposes hard limits on
signal propagation times" and "and also basic thermodynamics means work
generates waste heat, which has hard limits on dissipation.")


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"43Alexis
27 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Richard
27 May 25 i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1minforth
28 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"39dxf
28 May 25 i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"38Richard
28 May 25 i +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
29 May 25 i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"36dxf
29 May 25 i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"35Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"29Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   ii+- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1albert
31 May 25 i   ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Paul Rubin
31 May 25 i   ii `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Anton Ertl
3 Jun 25 i   i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"24anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"13Paul Rubin
6 Jun 25 i   i i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"12anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"11Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"9anthk
8 Jun 25 i   i i  i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"7LIT
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6Anton Ertl
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Anton Ertl
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
10 Jun 25 i   i i  i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"10LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6anthk
6 Jun 25 i   i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4John Ames
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2anthk
9 Jun 25 i   i  i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
6 Jun 25 i   i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3sjack
6 Jun 25 i   i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
6 Jun 25 i   i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2yeti
29 May 25 i   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
29 May 25 i   `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2sjack
30 May 25 i    `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
4 Jun 25 `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal