Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"
De : albert (at) *nospam* spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 29. May 2025, 12:02:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : KPN B.V.
Message-ID : <nnd$050f5a0b$0e70c84f@7af4dcadcaf4a98a>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <2025May29.102452@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>,
Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
<SNIP>
On my desktop I have JavaScript disabled.  There are lots of websites
the work fine without JavaScript.  And many of those that don't work
fine without JavaScript are a disappointment with JavaScript, too.

So true. Websites can only be dangerous if you have JavaScript enabled.
JavaScript is a carte blanche to run whatever code in your computer,
with the users privileges. https sites are "trusted", that means
that the communication is secure, not that there is no malicious
software present.

>
I think my laptop in 2005 was a Pentium 3 with 512MB of ram.
It would be almost unusable now.
>
The Pentium 3 was introduced in 1999, with new models introduced up to
2003.  As for using it, you might look at
<https://medium.com/@techrefreshing02/low-on-ram-try-these-5-lightweight-linux-distros-under-512mb-55e689ada854>

My Toshiba Windows XP (2000) is perfectly usable. I dropped it one too many times,
and the built in midi expander doesn't work any more, because I poked
in the innards.
>
- anton
--
Temu exploits Christians: (Disclaimer, only 10 apostles)
Last Supper Acrylic Suncatcher - 15Cm Round Stained Glass- Style Wall
Art For Home, Office And Garden Decor - Perfect For Windows, Bars,
And Gifts For Friends Family And Colleagues.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"43Alexis
27 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Richard
27 May 25 i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1minforth
28 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"39dxf
28 May 25 i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"38Richard
28 May 25 i +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
29 May 25 i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"36dxf
29 May 25 i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"35Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"29Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   ii+- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1albert
31 May 25 i   ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Paul Rubin
31 May 25 i   ii `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Anton Ertl
3 Jun 25 i   i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"24anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"13Paul Rubin
6 Jun 25 i   i i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"12anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"11Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"9anthk
8 Jun 25 i   i i  i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"7LIT
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6Anton Ertl
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Anton Ertl
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
10 Jun 25 i   i i  i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"10LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6anthk
6 Jun 25 i   i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4John Ames
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2anthk
9 Jun 25 i   i  i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
6 Jun 25 i   i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3sjack
6 Jun 25 i   i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
6 Jun 25 i   i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2yeti
29 May 25 i   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
29 May 25 i   `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2sjack
30 May 25 i    `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
4 Jun 25 `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal