Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"
De : anthk (at) *nospam* openbsd.home (anthk)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 06. Jun 2025, 13:00:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn1045m0u.1k5b.anthk@openbsd.home>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (OpenBSD)
On 2025-06-03, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote:
anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> writes:
- Links/Dillo Mainline as a browser
  - Dillectory: https://alex.envs.net/dillectory/
>
You can't browse the real web that way.  Consider the JS-based captchas
in front of almost everything right now, to slow down AI scrapers.  Then
look at the crap on actual web sites.  The other stuff is mostly still
workable.  Web browsers are the bottleneck.
>

The Dillectory has tons of alternatives. Also,
there's gopher://magical.fish and gemini://gemi.dev, and basic
TLS 1.3 can be granted with a client built with LibreSSL
or BearSSL. Nothing fancy, even a Pentium 4 with SSE2 can
do Gemini (and far less, I got to run a client
under the *old* Damn Small Linux release with a custom
OpenSSL client built from BearSSL libraries and
plus a modernish GAWK build.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"43Alexis
27 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Richard
27 May 25 i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1minforth
28 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"39dxf
28 May 25 i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"38Richard
28 May 25 i +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
29 May 25 i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"36dxf
29 May 25 i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"35Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"29Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   ii+- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1albert
31 May 25 i   ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Paul Rubin
31 May 25 i   ii `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Anton Ertl
3 Jun 25 i   i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"24anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"13Paul Rubin
6 Jun 25 i   i i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"12anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"11Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"9anthk
8 Jun 25 i   i i  i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"7LIT
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6Anton Ertl
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Anton Ertl
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
10 Jun 25 i   i i  i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"10LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6anthk
6 Jun 25 i   i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4John Ames
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2anthk
9 Jun 25 i   i  i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
6 Jun 25 i   i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3sjack
6 Jun 25 i   i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
6 Jun 25 i   i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2yeti
29 May 25 i   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
29 May 25 i   `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2sjack
30 May 25 i    `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
4 Jun 25 `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal