Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"
De : anthk (at) *nospam* openbsd.home (anthk)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 06. Jun 2025, 13:00:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn1045m2g.1k5b.anthk@openbsd.home>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (OpenBSD)
On 2025-06-03, LIT <zbigniew2011@gmail.com> wrote:
Your laptop with GNU/Linux/OpenBSD would be perfectly fine
for tons of tasks:
>
 "For tons of tasks" - sure, but not for
browsing the WWW in the state it's today.
About ten years ago I had to give up using
my old Athlon 3200+ machine used for the
"surfing", because it turned out, that after
next "upgrade" in my bank I wasn't able to
operate my bank account (and still more and
more websites became incredibly slow, when
browsing their contents). Yes, everyone
prefer to push the burden on your machine
by using that JS (that should be banned),
instead making their server doing that by
using PHP, for example.
>
 I used to use Lynx for browsing the
Web, to read news etc. as long, as it was
still possible - to not even glance at all
that shiny fluff, to avoid pop-up windows
etc. - but that time is over since almost
20 years ago today. Try to use Lynx today
with any site. Maybe 5-10% of them can be
browsed such way.
>
--

- Lynx

Links it's better, and far more with the PSP
or the Opera Mini user agent.

Also, I use both the DIllectory and Gopher/Gemini
sites.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"37Alexis
27 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Richard
27 May 25 i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1minforth
28 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"33dxf
28 May 25 i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"32Richard
28 May 25 i +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
29 May 25 i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"30dxf
29 May 25 i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"29Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"23Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   ii+- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1albert
31 May 25 i   ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Paul Rubin
31 May 25 i   ii `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Anton Ertl
3 Jun12:31 i   i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"18anthk
3 Jun12:39 i   i +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"8Paul Rubin
6 Jun13:00 i   i i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"7anthk
7 Jun01:02 i   i i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6Paul Rubin
8 Jun20:41 i   i i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4anthk
8 Jun21:41 i   i i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3LIT
8 Jun23:26 i   i i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Anton Ertl
8 Jun23:58 i   i i  i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
8 Jun20:41 i   i i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
3 Jun13:07 i   i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"9LIT
6 Jun13:00 i   i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5anthk
6 Jun14:21 i   i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4LIT
6 Jun15:54 i   i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3John Ames
7 Jun13:47 i   i  i  +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
7 Jun13:47 i   i  i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
6 Jun15:37 i   i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3sjack
6 Jun15:55 i   i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
6 Jun19:13 i   i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2yeti
29 May 25 i   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
29 May 25 i   `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2sjack
30 May 25 i    `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
4 Jun17:48 `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal