Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions

It was thus said that the Great dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> once stated:
...

Even small forths can do better than what the standard offers by simply factoring
out tools already present e.g.
>
(.)  (D.)  (U.)  /CHAR  >CHAR  >DIGIT  HELD  MU*  MU/MOD  TRIM  UNNEST
>
I'd rather have these than all the support for wordlists DEFER and other stuff
the standard and folks have obsessed over.

 
  Can you not implement them with ANS Forth?