Sujet : Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions
De : dxforth (at) *nospam* gmail.com (dxf)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 07. Jun 2025, 05:42:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <dd93a943efc16104d3926ce3394125ae1a50c199@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/06/2025 2:26 pm,
sean@conman.org wrote:
It was thus said that the Great dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> once stated:
...
Even small forths can do better than what the standard offers by simply factoring
out tools already present e.g.
>
(.) (D.) (U.) /CHAR >CHAR >DIGIT HELD MU* MU/MOD TRIM UNNEST
>
I'd rather have these than all the support for wordlists DEFER and other stuff
the standard and folks have obsessed over.
Can you not implement them with ANS Forth?
Where's the intelligence in re-inventing what already exists?
THROW codes and ambiguous conditions
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions