Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions
De : zbigniew2011 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (LIT)
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 09. Jun 2025, 13:24:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <5244ae93cb596f4913a998c0ef209935@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Tried to load LIT's Roman code into FigForth for CP/M only to find it
used
non-Fig words NIP 2DROP TUCK 1- .  I also needed something akin to S" to
pass
the numeric string to the routine.  All edits had to done externally as
no
editor was present.  After fixing all that the routine still didn't work
properly.  It appears LIT's code relies on a non-symmetric DO LOOP -
which is
not FigForth standard.  Let's just say I won't be returning to FigForth
any
time soon.  Once in a decade is enough to remind me 'Never again' :)
You may want to try this one:
 https://www.forth.org/fig86new.zip
This is the one I'm tinkering with (just presently
I already heavily modified it) and its loops are
pretty standard, I believe (it's from 1982).
It started few years ago, when I was curious could
I make it assemble using MASM (it didn't want to...),
because it was prepared using some 'exotic' one, no
more available.
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 May 25 * THROW codes and ambiguous conditions39dxf
31 May 25 +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions7Anton Ertl
31 May 25 i+* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
3 Jun 25 ii`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1sjack
31 May 25 i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3albert
1 Jun 25 i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i   `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1albert
1 Jun 25 `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions31Hans Bezemer
2 Jun 25  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
2 Jun 25  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions29albert
3 Jun 25   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions28dxf
3 Jun 25    +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions24Anton Ertl
4 Jun15:44    i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions23dxf
4 Jun20:25    i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions22sean
5 Jun07:09    i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
5 Jun11:17    i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions20albert
6 Jun01:47    i   +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
6 Jun07:15    i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions18sean
6 Jun12:00    i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions17albert
6 Jun22:06    i     `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions16sean
7 Jun04:10    i      `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions15dxf
7 Jun05:26    i       `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions14sean
7 Jun05:42    i        +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
7 Jun10:43    i        +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions11Anton Ertl
7 Jun15:06    i        i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions10dxf
7 Jun20:58    i        i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions9Paul Rubin
8 Jun02:49    i        i  +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3Paul Rubin
8 Jun04:36    i        i  i+- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun09:07    i        i  i`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Anton Ertl
8 Jun03:16    i        i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun08:56    i        i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
8 Jun15:45    i        i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3dxf
9 Jun12:36    i        i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
9 Jun13:24    i        i     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
7 Jun15:41    i        `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
3 Jun 25    +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1John
4 Jun 25    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
6 Jun11:47     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Hans Bezemer

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal