Re: Parsing timestamps?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl forth 
Sujet : Re: Parsing timestamps?
De : albert (at) *nospam* spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Groupes : comp.lang.forth
Date : 20. Jun 2025, 10:25:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : KPN B.V.
Message-ID : <nnd$5a71a774$696ff6ad@241d297822922bfb>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <f4aaff9dbf58ca3c0e5da7fe278b5a87@www.novabbs.com>,
mhx <mhx@iae.nl> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 5:36:05 +0000, minforth wrote:
>
Counter-example: a good number of my apps involve structs, arrays
and signal vectors in heap memory. Stack juggling? Absolutely not.
The code would be unreadable and a nightmare to debug.
>
Factoring in smaller code portions is often impossible because
you can't always distribute data, that inherently belongs together,
over separate words.
>
Then why factor, when with using named parameters = locals, the
code is already short, readable, maintainable, and bug-free.
>
Interesting questions. My experience says that arrays and vectors are
ok, but structs are dangerous, (especially?) when nested. In a 'C'
project that I contribute to, structs arbitrarily glue data together,
and then forwardly defined macros hide the details.
It is impossible to debug this code without tools to decompile/inspect
the source. It is very difficult to change/rearrange/delete struct
fields, because they may be used in other places of the code for a
completely different purpose. The result is that structs only grow
and nobody dares to prune them. The only remedy is to completely
start over.

I took over the maintenance of manx (that Marcel wrote) and
I gave up on maintenance because of the structs.
The following example uses mini objects.
A part is a subdivision of a musical score that is played on the
same instrument. A timeline is used to keep track of the focus
when the playing of the piece progresses.

Now look at Forth objects that generalizes CREATE/DOES>
Here the actions (methods) are directly linked to the
offset in the object ("struct"):
Note that mbeat !mbeat (mbeat) work on the same offset (0)
where an arbitrary value (_) is initialised (using comma `,).
These three words can be reordered with impunity.
The same applies to the TIED-group.
You could interchange the TIED-group with the mbeat-group
without affecting other parts of the program.
Methods of the real time "field" uses !mbeat, so this group
then must move after the beat-group.
m/note m/beat etc. are approcimately "fields", and can be
reordered among themselves.
\ -----------------------------------------------
    \ The class of a time line of a part.
    \ Each part has a time line, and then there is the real time.
    class  TIMELINE
      M: mbeat       @ M;        \ Return current play TIME.
      M: !mbeat      0 SWAP ! M; \ Initialise timeline.
      M: (mbeat)     M;  _ ,      \ The timeline of this part.

    \ The real time in TICKS is associated with the current midi time
    \ and made the reference time.
      M: reference-ticks   @ M;
      M: SET-TIME   !  !mbeat M;
      0 ,   \ Real time corresponding to mbeat = 0 .

    \   \ The moment of the latest bar, in midibeats since the start.
    \   M: latestbar        M;   _ ,

      M: m/note     M;  _ ,       \ The current note duration in midibeats.
      M: m/beat     M;  _ ,       \ The current beat duration in midibeats.
      M: m/measure  M;  0 ,    \ The current measure duration in midibeats.

        \ The amount of semitones the playing is higher than the score.
        \ Negative means lower.
      M: TRANSPOSE  M;  0 ,
      \ Ratio between actual and formal note duration.
      M: (ARTICULATION) M; 1 , 1 , \ Default : legato.

      M: TIED-NOTES M;   HERE 20 CELLS ALLOT !BAG \ A BAG with tied ``NOTE''s.
      M: TIED!      TRUE SWAP ! M;      \ Next note must be tied.
      M: UNTIED!    FALSE SWAP ! M;     \ .. must not ..
      M: TIED?      @ M;  0 ,        \ "This note MUST be tied."
    endclass

>
Ask yourself why the Forth Scientific Library makes heavy use of
locals.
>
Because the original algorithms do.

Case in point the original manx from Marcel did not use too
many locals, in the new manx they are not used at all.

>
Of course things look different with simpler applications.
>
And then Einstein's famous quote spoils the fun.

The new manx is eminently servicable. There are version of
different (ARM) hardware where the lowlevel control is
completely different (Originally meant for the parallel port
in MSDOS). The instrument drivers are of course hardware
dependant, they are just plugged in.
The original instruments were percussion, where the note-off
from midi was ignored.
Later the organ came along, that uses the note-off midi messages,
without any repercussions on the architecture of the program.

Please note that I introduced many names, but not named
"local values".

>
-marcel
--
Temu exploits Christians: (Disclaimer, only 10 apostles)
Last Supper Acrylic Suncatcher - 15Cm Round Stained Glass- Style Wall
Art For Home, Office And Garden Decor - Perfect For Windows, Bars,
And Gifts For Friends Family And Colleagues.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 * Parsing timestamps?282dxf
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?245mhx
6 Oct 24 i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?3dxf
6 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Parsing timestamps?2dxf
7 Oct 24 ii `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
7 Jun 25 i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?241B. Pym
7 Jun 25 i +* Re: Parsing timestamps?225dxf
7 Jun 25 i i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?224LIT
8 Jun 25 i i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?223dxf
9 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?222Hans Bezemer
9 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?221LIT
9 Jun 25 i i    `* Re: Parsing timestamps?220Hans Bezemer
9 Jun 25 i i     `* Re: Parsing timestamps?219LIT
10 Jun 25 i i      +* Re: Parsing timestamps?207dxf
10 Jun 25 i i      i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?2mhx
10 Jun 25 i i      ii`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
10 Jun 25 i i      i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1LIT
19 Jun 25 i i      i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?203LIT
20 Jun 25 i i      i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?202dxf
20 Jun 25 i i      i  +* Re: Parsing timestamps?7minforth
20 Jun 25 i i      i  i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?2mhx
20 Jun 25 i i      i  ii`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1albert
20 Jun 25 i i      i  i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?4dxf
20 Jun 25 i i      i  i +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1mhx
20 Jun 25 i i      i  i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?2minforth
21 Jun 25 i i      i  i  `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
20 Jun 25 i i      i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?194LIT
21 Jun 25 i i      i   +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
22 Jun 25 i i      i   +* Re: Parsing timestamps?187minforth
23 Jun 25 i i      i   i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
23 Jun 25 i i      i   i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?181Anton Ertl
23 Jun 25 i i      i   ii`* Re: Parsing timestamps?180minforth
24 Jun 25 i i      i   ii +* Re: Parsing timestamps?162minforth
24 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?161dxf
24 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i +* Re: Parsing timestamps?13minforth
24 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Anton Ertl
1 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i ii`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Stephen Pelc
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i+* Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)2Paul Rubin
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i ii`- Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)1albert
15 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i`* Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)8LIT
16 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i `* Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)7minforth
16 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i  +* Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)5dxf
16 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i  i+- Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)1minforth
16 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i  i`* Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)3LIT
17 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i  i `* Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)2dxf
17 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i  i  `- Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)1LIT
16 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i  `- Re: The future. (was Re: Parsing timestamps?)1LIT
25 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i +* Re: Parsing timestamps?12dxf
25 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?11Paul Rubin
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Paul Rubin
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?9dxf
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?8Paul Rubin
27 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?7dxf
27 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i    +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Paul Rubin
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i    `* Re: Parsing timestamps?5dxf
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i     +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Stephen Pelc
4 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i     i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
6 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i     `* Re: Parsing timestamps?2LIT
6 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i i      `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
25 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Paul Rubin
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Hans Bezemer
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?133Waldek Hebisch
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?132minforth
26 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i   +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2LIT
27 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i   i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1minforth
29 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?129Anton Ertl
29 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i    `* Re: Parsing timestamps?128LIT
29 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     +* Re: Parsing timestamps?123LIT
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?122dxf
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?121LIT
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  +* Re: Parsing timestamps?116dxf
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?115LIT
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?114dxf
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i  +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2LIT
1 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i  i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?111Paul Rubin
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i   +* Re: Parsing timestamps?3LIT
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i   i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1LIT
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i   i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Paul Rubin
1 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?107Paul Rubin
1 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    +* Re: Parsing timestamps?18minforth
1 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?17Paul Rubin
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i +* Re: Parsing timestamps?4minforth
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1minforth
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Anton Ertl
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?12Anton Ertl
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  +* Re: Parsing timestamps?8Paul Rubin
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?2minforth
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  ii`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1albert
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?3Hans Bezemer
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  ii`* Re: Parsing timestamps?2albert
5 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  ii `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  i+- Re: Parsing timestamps?1albert
4 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Anton Ertl
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  i`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Hans Bezemer
3 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i  `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1dxf
1 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    +* Re: Parsing timestamps?5peter
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i+* Re: Parsing timestamps?2minforth
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    ii`- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Anton Ertl
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Paul Rubin
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii i     i  i    `* Re: Parsing timestamps?83Anton Ertl
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     i  `* Re: Parsing timestamps?4Paul Rubin
29 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     +* Re: Parsing timestamps?3Paul Rubin
30 Jun 25 i i      i   ii i     `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1sean
24 Jun 25 i i      i   ii +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Anton Ertl
2 Jul 25 i i      i   ii `* Nested definitions (was: Parsing timestamps?)16Ruvim
23 Jun 25 i i      i   i`* Re: Parsing timestamps?4mhx
23 Jun 25 i i      i   `* Re: Parsing timestamps?5LIT
10 Jun 25 i i      +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2LIT
10 Jun 25 i i      +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2LIT
10 Jun 25 i i      +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Stephen Pelc
10 Jun 25 i i      +* Re: Parsing timestamps?4LIT
10 Jun 25 i i      `- Re: Parsing timestamps?1Hans Bezemer
9 Jun 25 i +- Re: Parsing timestamps?1B. Pym
10 Jun 25 i `* Re: Parsing timestamps?14B. Pym
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?5Ruvim
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?6FFmike
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?2Anthony Howe
7 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?9albert
8 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?3albert
9 Oct 24 +* Re: Parsing timestamps?4alaa
18 Oct 24 `* Re: Parsing timestamps?7Gerry Jackson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal