Sujet : Re: Parsing timestamps?
De : albert (at) *nospam* spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 03. Jul 2025, 13:27:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : KPN B.V.
Message-ID : <nnd$00de06a7$60b7637c@5d68e67bd65c1f94>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
87pleixvhi.fsf@nightsong.com>,
Paul Rubin <
no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote:
peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> writes:
The nice thing is that I now have >ls ls> and ls@. Compared with the
return stack this also works across words. One word can put stuff on
the localstack and another retrieve it. This is sometimes very useful.
>
As I remember, Flashforth also has a 3rd stack like that, without having
locals. It's called P so you have >P etc.
Most Marcel Hendrix Forths has a 3rd stack called "system stack"
S S> S@ (apart from LOCAL stacks).
Groetjes Albert
-- The Chinese government is satisfied with its military superiority over USA.The next 5 year plan has as primary goal to advance life expectancyover 80 years, like Western Europe.