Sujet : Re: Parsing timestamps?
De : anton (at) *nospam* mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Groupes : comp.lang.forthDate : 11. Jul 2025, 11:14:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID : <2025Jul11.121449@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : xrn 10.11
Paul Rubin <
no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
I have looked at a (IIRC) slide deck by Kahan where he shows examples
where the altenarnative by Gustafson (don't remember which one he
looked at in that slide deck) fails and traditional FP numbers work.
>
Maybe this: http://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/UnumSORN.pdf
Yes.
Here's a quote:
| These claims pander to Ignorance and Wishful Thinking.
That's my impression, too, and not just for Type I unums.
- anton
-- M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.htmlcomp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html New standard: https://forth-standard.org/EuroForth 2023 proceedings: http://www.euroforth.org/ef23/papers/EuroForth 2024 proceedings:
http://www.euroforth.org/ef24/papers/