Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl misc 
Sujet : Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.unix.shell comp.unix.programmer comp.lang.misc
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 23:22:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdhsni$2t1fi$12@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 20:41:11 -0000 (UTC), usuario wrote:

With eshell you can do sh like commands and put elisp (literal lisp
code) inside a loop:
 
https://howardism.org/Technical/Emacs/eshell-why.html

You have to put quotes around literal strings. That still makes it a
“programming language”, not a “command language” (according to my original
definition).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Sep 24 * Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages4Bozo User
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24  `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2usuario
1 Oct 24   `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal