Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cm sendmail 
Sujet : Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection
De : hquest (at) *nospam* hquest.pro.br (HQuest)
Groupes : comp.mail.sendmail
Date : 26. Apr 2024, 23:19:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <9c036674340a558c742c864a95764304@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Claus Aßmann wrote:
Do you get any mail from them or does this always happen?
From Proofpoint I used to get, but they began consistently failing in the past 2-3 weeks. From Cisco, it is a hit or miss. From a few other providers, we only recently started doing business with them, so never found in my log archives (went back to about 2y of past logs to confirm).

define(`confTO_COMMAND', `1m')dnl
Why did you choose this?
I believe this was recommendation from a 3rd party.

Kcheck_client dns -R a -T T -q
Where/how is this used?
It came as part of DNSBL setup, but judging by your reaction, seems not required, and I'm more than happy to clear it out. Less is more (except timeout, it seems).

Apr 26 13:16:01 mxhost sm-mta[126129]: NOQUEUE: connect from
mx0a-0017d901.pphosted.com [208.84.65.218]

Apr 26 13:17:01 mxhost sm-mta[126129]: 43QHG1xY126129: timeout waiting
for input from mx0a-0017d901.pphosted.com during server cmd read

Maybe 1m is too short, esp. if DNS lookups take a while.
The default is much longer - see the docs.
It is interesting that these timeout changes occurred over a year ago. I can see a DNS query and response for these incoming systems happening in under 2 seconds. Will change those back to their default and see how it behaves. More to come.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Apr 24 * [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection15HQuest
26 Apr 24 `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection14Claus Aßmann
26 Apr 24  `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection13HQuest
27 Apr 24   +- Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection1HQuest
27 Apr 24   `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection11HQuest
27 Apr 24    +* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection5Claus Aßmann
27 Apr 24    i`* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection4HQuest
27 Apr 24    i `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection3Claus Aßmann
28 Apr 24    i  `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection2HQuest
28 Apr 24    i   `- Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection1Marco Moock
28 Apr 24    `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection5Claus Aßmann
28 Apr 24     +* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection2HQuest
29 Apr 24     i`- Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection1HQuest
29 Apr 24     `* Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection2Grant Taylor
29 Apr 24      `- Re: [client] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection1Grant Taylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal