Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cm sendmail 
Sujet : Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?
De : johnl (at) *nospam* taugh.com (John Levine)
Groupes : comp.mail.sendmail
Date : 22. May 2025, 21:09:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Taughannock Networks
Message-ID : <100o09l$28bu$2@gal.iecc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
According to Claus A�mann  <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org>:
Certificate:
       X509v3 extensions:
           X509v3 Extended Key Usage:
               TLS Web Server Authentication
>
Used by client: no error in client, but the server shows
status=unsupported certificate purpose
hence the cert is basically unusable for a client -
as some people claimed.

I'm not worried about that since basically nobody uses client certs signed by a public CA.

I was worried that some bug would look for it in server certs.  That seems OK.

--
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May 25 * Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?8John Levine
20 May 25 `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?7Claus Aßmann
20 May 25  `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?6John Levine
21 May 25   `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?5Claus Aßmann
22 May 25    +* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?2Claus Aßmann
22 May 25    i`- Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?1John Levine
22 May 25    `* Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?2John Levine
23 May 25     `- Re: Client Auth certificates, threat or menace?1Claus Aßmann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal