Re: OpenPGP Versus GnuPG

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: OpenPGP Versus GnuPG
De : jmclnx (at) *nospam* gmail.com.invalid (John McCue)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 24. Jun 2025, 02:42:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103cvqq$1k7g2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.161 (x86_64))
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
It seems the developers of GnuPG are starting to diverge from the OpenPGP
standard, and go their own, incompatible way. I got notes about this from
the last few upgrades of my Debian Unstable systems, and so searching
about online led me (yet again) to the ever-dependable ArchLinux Wiki
<https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GnuPG>, which has a section on “OpenPGP
compatibility”, with links to more details about the schism.
 
So the Debian folks seem reluctant to go along with this, and they’re not
the only ones.

I wonder how many people is still on OpenPGP ?  *BSD and
Linux both use GnuPG.  Also Thunderbird rolled their own
a few years ago, AFAIK Thunderbird lets you import GnuPG
keys into their version.

--
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
                        - Paraphrasing Star Wars

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jun 25 * OpenPGP Versus GnuPG3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Jun 25 `* Re: OpenPGP Versus GnuPG2John McCue
24 Jun 25  `- Re: OpenPGP Versus GnuPG1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal