Re: UNIX systems

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: UNIX systems
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 18. Mar 2025, 10:50:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <5085869c-628a-949d-7bea-f058a2a0b450@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025, Salvador Mirzo wrote:

Only 3 hours? How old is your laptop? Sounds like you should at least be able to
get 7-8 hours out of a new one, unless you are running enormous amount of VM:s
or scientific calculations.
>
Right now I get 1 hour, so 3 is a major upgrade.  My notebook is quite
new.  It's a Lenovo 15IMH05 with 24 GiB of RAM.
Hmm, sounds like something is wrong somewhere. I'd install powertop and/or tlp
and also make sure to disable Intel VMD in case it is enabled in your bios.
With those three, you should be able to double your battery time at least.
For me, the biggest difference was disabling intel VMD in the bios, that made a
huge difference.

True.
>
I have 4 virtual desktop. On 1 lives the web browser, 2 alpine email
(terminal based email client), 3 qpdf a pdf reader with session
support and on 4 my neovim with aout 18 buffers saved in a session
file.
>
That's very close to my what I do here.  The web on 2.  My 1 is work. :)
On 3 is USENET and 4 is literature---PDF.
You are a wise man!

I run cwm, which is known as not having a virtual desktop thingies, but
it's actually does.  When I press super-1 I go to desktop 1.  I created
4 virtual desktops (which is enough), but I think I could have at least
9 of them.
...
Yeah, these things are important---printer, scanner and wifi.  Although
I wonder if it is easy to get p/s/w on cwm without having to pull in all of xfce
under the hood? That would be awesome!

I think wifi is a lot less important than it seems.  I've read this
article yesterday called ``the computer built to last 50 years'' and
offline mode is quite an important part of it.  I agree with that.
>
The system would be designed to usually function offline.  It's when you
connect to the Internet that it does its pull and pushes.  With a system
like that, wifi is less important---you connect your system to the
router once a day, say, and, just like pumping gas into a vehicle, you
get everything you need.  Now you can go back to your desk, after
unplugging the cable from your router.
>
I like that.
True. But it would not be convenient for me. The wife would be angry with
network cables everywhere. ;)

Clearly, these are people trying to work without distractions and
interruptions.  I am one of them.
>
My latest revelation (a few years back) was alpine email, it probably
doubled my email productivity compared with thunderbird, and is a "all
in one" solution that comes with a lot of help included. Still
flexible and extensible though, but probably not as much as mutt or
neomutt, but it strikes a beautiful balance for me. =)
>
Now I would really look into alpine, but I'm a Gnus user, so I'm
forbidden from performing heretic research.
Haha... true. Well, if you are already into tui email, I think the gains will be
less. I suspect that alpine is not the most efficient one. But I think it is
perhaps a bit easier to get started with.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy284Retrograde
16 Feb 25 `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy283D
17 Feb 25  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy282Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy281D
17 Feb 25    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy73Adrian
17 Feb 25    i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy72D
18 Feb 25    i +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy47Adrian
18 Feb 25    i i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15Sn!pe
18 Feb 25    i ii+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy12D
20 Feb 25    i iii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy11Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5Sn!pe
20 Feb 25    i iii i+- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3Scott Dorsey
21 Feb 25    i iii i +- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i iii i `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
20 Feb 25    i iii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5D
20 Feb 25    i iii  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy4Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3D
21 Feb 25    i iii    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i iii     `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
18 Feb 25    i ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Adrian
20 Feb 25    i ii `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
18 Feb 25    i i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy25D
18 Feb 25    i ii+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy18Adrian
20 Feb 25    i iii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy17Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy16D
20 Feb 25    i iii  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii   +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3Sn!pe
21 Feb 25    i iii   i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i iii   i `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
21 Feb 25    i iii   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy11D
24 Feb 25    i iii    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25    i iii    i`- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
25 Feb 25    i iii    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy8Anton Shepelev
25 Feb 25    i iii     `* small communities, nntp server (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)7Salvador Mirzo
26 Feb 25    i iii      +* Re: small communities, nntp server (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)3D
27 Feb 25    i iii      i`* Re: small communities, nntp server2Salvador Mirzo
27 Feb 25    i iii      i `- Re: small communities, nntp server1D
26 Feb 25    i iii      `* Re: small communities, nntp server3yeti
26 Feb 25    i iii       +- Re: small communities, nntp server1D
26 Feb 25    i iii       `- Re: small communities, nntp server1D
20 Feb 25    i ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy6Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i ii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5D
20 Feb 25    i ii  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy4Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i ii   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3D
21 Feb 25    i ii    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i ii     `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
20 Feb 25    i i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy6Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5Scott Dorsey
21 Feb 25    i i  +- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i i  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3D
22 Feb 25    i i   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Scott Dorsey
23 Feb 25    i i    `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
20 Feb 25    i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy24Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy23D
20 Feb 25    i   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy22Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy21D
21 Feb 25    i     `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy20Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i      `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy19D
24 Feb 25    i       `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy18Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25    i        `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy17D
24 Feb 25    i         `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy16Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25    i          `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15D
25 Feb 25    i           +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy12Salvador Mirzo
25 Feb 25    i           i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy11D
25 Feb 25    i           i `* OT: personal stories (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)10Salvador Mirzo
26 Feb 25    i           i  `* Re: OT: personal stories (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)9D
27 Feb 25    i           i   `* Re: OT: personal stories8Salvador Mirzo
27 Feb 25    i           i    `* Re: OT: personal stories7D
8 Mar 25    i           i     `* Re: OT: personal stories6Salvador Mirzo
8 Mar 25    i           i      +* Re: OT: personal stories2yeti
8 Mar 25    i           i      i`- Re: OT: personal stories1D
8 Mar 25    i           i      `* Re: OT: personal stories3D
9 Mar 25    i           i       `* Re: OT: personal stories2Salvador Mirzo
9 Mar 25    i           i        `- Re: OT: personal stories1D
25 Feb 25    i           `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2D Finnigan
27 Feb 25    i            `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy207D
17 Feb 25     +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Scott Dorsey
18 Feb 25     i`- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
18 Feb 25     `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy204Computer Nerd Kev
19 Feb 25      +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy160Eli the Bearded
19 Feb 25      i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy4D
6 Mar 25      ii+- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Ivan Shmakov
8 Mar 25      ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
8 Mar 25      ii `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
19 Feb 25      i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy155Computer Nerd Kev
20 Feb 25      i +- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25      i +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy152D
20 Feb 25      i i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy151Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25      i i +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy95Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25      i i i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy94D
21 Feb 25      i i i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy93Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25      i i i  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy92D
24 Feb 25      i i i   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy91Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25      i i i    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Rich
24 Feb 25      i i i    i`- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25      i i i    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy30D
24 Feb 25      i i i    i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy14Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25      i i i    ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy13D
25 Feb 25      i i i    ii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy12Rich
24 Feb 25      i i i    i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15Rich
26 Feb 25      i i i    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy58Scott Dorsey
20 Feb 25      i i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy55D
4 Mar 25      i `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Eli the Bearded
19 Feb 25      +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy41D
20 Feb 25      `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal