Sujet : Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s
De : pj (at) *nospam* jostle.com (Peter Jason)
Groupes : comp.misc nz.general aus.computersDate : 05. Jun 2025, 02:53:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <7pt14kldb43r6oj1ois4ns05qs2o4kg4kk@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 23 May 2025 14:44:43 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
Scott Dorsey wrote
>
The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
>
Not even possible
>
Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't
they?
>
Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)
>
We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it
provides no context.
>
There has to be some balance between freedom and control.
>
Bullshit
>
It is not bullshit.
>
Its complete and utter bullshit
>
It's common sense.
>
Control isnt even possible
Some control is possible. No one gets it 100% of the time
>
In the USA various venereal diseases, like clamidia and
gonorrhea are out of control, especially among blacks.
>
Bullshit
>
Look it up!
>
Nothing to look up that says anything even remotely like that
Jesus, every medical book says so,
They're screwing themselves into an early grave.
>
It is not bullshit.
>
Its complete and utter bullshit
The above is solid gold diamond encrusted truth. Why is everything
"bullshit".?
>
The mechanics of sex must be combined with social skills&
responsibilities and should be taught from a young age.
>
Not even possible.
>
Yes it is. Flog them if they refuse to learn!
>
Even sillier than you usually manage and not even legal
Wot? All the best things are illegal. Look at the USA govt debt!
>
Various religions oppose this mainly in
the endeavor to breed more adherents,
>
That's not why they do that
>
It's the main one!
>
Bullshit it is. If it was, they wouldnt be banning fucking outside marriage
Yes they would given the roving stud could be of any religion.
>
and the costs of caring for bastards and gravid mothers.
>
In fact the stupid child benefits system actually encourages that
>
"Child benefits" do not knock them up?
>
But is the reason the dregs choose to have the brats, so they dont
have to work and just put their hand out to the govt instead
Nevertheless the result is poor-quality bastards.
Banning Social Media For Under-16s
Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s