Sujet : Re: vtm: tiling window manager with drag and drop
De : ${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-if-you-must} (at) *nospam* jusme.com (Ian)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 19. Apr 2025, 09:20:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Wet Socks!
Message-ID : <slrn1006n6g.41d.${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-i@vm46.home.jusme.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-04-19, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:52:38 -0000 (UTC), Ian wrote:
>
$ /data/ftp/vtm/vtm
os: Terminal type: linux os: Color mode: xterm truecolor os: Mouse
mode: VT-style
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
Try running it under GDB and getting a traceback. Is it built with
debugging symbols?
$ gdb /data/ftp/vtm/vtm
GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-120.el7
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /data/ftp/vtm/vtm...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /data/ftp/vtm/vtm
os: Terminal type: xterm-256color
os: Color mode: xterm truecolor
os: Mouse mode: VT-style
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000008d74b7 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000008d74b7 in ?? ()
#1 0x00000000008d6311 in ?? ()
#2 0x00000000008d2889 in ?? ()
#3 0x00000000008d59df in ?? ()
#4 0x00000000008d2889 in ?? ()
#5 0x00000000008d5d82 in ?? ()
#6 0x00000000008b03aa in ?? ()
#7 0x00000000008d2889 in ?? ()
#8 0x00000000008d2939 in ?? ()
#9 0x00000000008b07fe in ?? ()
#10 0x00000000008e6a4f in ?? ()
#11 0x00000000008e6e75 in ?? ()
#12 0x00000000008d25b1 in ?? ()
#13 0x00000000008a585f in ?? ()
#14 0x000000000084b5e8 in ?? ()
#15 0x000000000044703d in ?? ()
#16 0x000000000042e633 in ?? ()
#17 0x00000000008239b8 in ?? ()
#18 0x0000000000825b80 in ?? ()
#19 0x0000000000431f15 in ?? ()
So no :(
To be fair, this is on CentOS7, which seems to have been deprecated
faster than a fast thing. I'll try it on Alma9 at some point.
-- Ian"Tamahome!!!" - "Miaka!!!"