Sujet : Re: Is Programming Obsolete?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 11. Apr 2024, 04:07:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uv7k50$1f7vt$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:40:05 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 05:39 this Wednesday
(GMT):
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:10:10 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 00:30 this Tuesday
(GMT):
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:30:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 06:49 this Monday
(GMT):
>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:20:02 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
The problem happens when there's no way to access the underlying
functions, or it requires bad workarounds like the GUI scripting.
>
That kind of thing seems less common in the Open Source world.
Perhaps because it is more likely to be seen as a bug and fixed.
Of course, the opposite is usually more true. A lot of stuff is
terminal-only.
>
Feel free to offer examples.
Installing things?
>
Scriptable.
Yes? That was my point, that more options are available in the terminal.
No, you said “the opposite is usually more true”, in reply to my saying
that lack of scriptability is “more likely to be seen as a bug and fixed”.
Is Programming Obsolete?
Re: Is Programming Obsolete?
