Sujet : Re: Is Programming Obsolete?
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 11. Apr 2024, 15:30:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uv8s5j$1nu6a$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 03:07 this Thursday (GMT):
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:40:05 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 05:39 this Wednesday
(GMT):
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:10:10 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 00:30 this Tuesday
(GMT):
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:30:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 06:49 this Monday
(GMT):
>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:20:02 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
The problem happens when there's no way to access the underlying
functions, or it requires bad workarounds like the GUI scripting.
>
That kind of thing seems less common in the Open Source world.
Perhaps because it is more likely to be seen as a bug and fixed.
Of course, the opposite is usually more true. A lot of stuff is
terminal-only.
>
Feel free to offer examples.
Installing things?
>
Scriptable.
Yes? That was my point, that more options are available in the terminal.
>
No, you said “the opposite is usually more true”, in reply to my saying
that lack of scriptability is “more likely to be seen as a bug and fixed”.
Oh, sorry.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Is Programming Obsolete?
Re: Is Programming Obsolete?
