Sujet : Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display
De : snipeco.2 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 30. Apr 2024, 00:10:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds
Message-ID : <1qsswfs.ggxhsjkj5mwaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.6b1 (ed136d9b90) (Mac OS 10.13.6)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:23:22 -0000 (UTC), Ben Collver wrote:
The DEC VT100 terminal had an 80x24 display.
So did the VT52 before it. One of the innovations in the VT100 was it also
had a 132-column mode. In this mode, the number of displayable lines
shrank to 14, as I recall; unless you had the extra-cost "AVO" ("Advanced
Video Option") addon, one of the features of which was enough video RAM to
keep displaying 24 lines in this mode.
It was not really a comfortable mode to use. I kept thinking something was
squeezing my eyes together ...
Punch cards have a longer history than you might think.
Right back to about 1804, in fact. Trivia question: what were they being
used for then?
That would be the Jacquard loom machine.
-- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator My pet rock Gordon just is.
| Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
| 29 Apr 24 |  IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 19 | | Ben Collver |
| 30 Apr 24 |  Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 2 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| 30 Apr 24 |    Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Sn!pe |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | candycanearter07 |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 12 | | Dan Espen |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 10 | | Ben Collver |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 8 | | Dan Espen |
| 30 Apr 24 |  Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 4 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Jim Jackson |
| 1 May 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 2 | | Dan Espen |
| 1 May 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 2 | | Ben Collver |
| 1 May 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| 1 May 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | John McCue |
| 1 May 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Scott Dorsey |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 3 | | Stefan Ram |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| 30 Apr 24 | Re: IBM, sonic delay lines, and the history of the 80x24 display | 1 | | Ben Collver |