Sujet : Re: strlcpy and how CPUs can defy common sense
De : jmccue (at) *nospam* magnetar.jmcunx.com (John McCue)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 27. Jul 2024, 20:58:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v83jge$3h76j$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.161 (x86_64))
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:36:17 -0000 (UTC), Ben Collver wrote:
The situation only gets worse for the openbsd version here, not better.
Not the only time the GNU folks have done something smarter than the BSD
folks.
I do not understand this statement in regards to true(1).
<http://trillian.mit.edu/~jc/humor/ATT_Copyright_true.html>
This is interesting
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/10/line_break_ep2/>
How is GNU's version of true better than OpenBSD's ?
See page 2 in the articke.
-- [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars
strlcpy and how CPUs can defy common sense
Re: strlcpy and how CPUs can defy common sense