Re: Unicode 16 Is Out

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Unicode 16 Is Out
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 14. Sep 2024, 23:35:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vc533p$1n80k$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:35:10 -0000 (UTC), John McCue wrote:

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
Which ones do you think are not distinctly different?
 
See:
 
https://jkorpela.fi/dashes.html

They all have different representations/meanings, which is why they’re
there.

To me there is no need for multiple '-' characters.

Not good enough for typeset-quality text. Even if you want to confine
yourself to English text in Roman script, which a lot of people don’t.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Sep 24 * Unicode 16 Is Out8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Sep 24 `* Re: Unicode 16 Is Out7John McCue
14 Sep 24  +* Re: Unicode 16 Is Out3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Sep 24  i`* Re: Unicode 16 Is Out2John McCue
15 Sep 24  i `- Re: Unicode 16 Is Out1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Sep 24  +- Re: Unicode 16 Is Out1Eli the Bearded
21 Sep 24  `* Re: Unicode 16 Is Out2Richmond
22 Sep 24   `- Re: Unicode 16 Is Out1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal