Re: Security? What "Security"?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Security? What "Security"?
De : kludge (at) *nospam* panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 13. Oct 2024, 00:26:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID : <vef0ib$l58$1@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3
Farley Flud  <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:52:47 -0000 (UTC), John McCue wrote:
>
 
Well I would say Gordon could be correct.  I say that due to
Intel ME and probably AMD SE:
 
>
The Intel ME can be disabled in the motherboard BIOS.  Whenever
I build a new machine it is one of the first things that I
disable.

No.  The interface that makes the ME visible to the operating system
can be disabled, but the ME is still down there doing whatever
undocumented things it does.  If it wasn't, the processor would never
be able to load the microcode in the first place.

Also, the Linux kernel can be configured and built without
the MEI driver by disabling CONFIG_INTEL_MEI, which is located
here:
>
drivers/misc/mei

Yes, this keeps the operating system from being able to talk to the
ME... but it doesn't stop the ME from doing whatever it does.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Oct 24 * Security? What "Security"?35Sn!pe
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?6John McCue
11 Oct 24 i+- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Sn!pe
11 Oct 24 i+* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Farley Flud
13 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Security? What "Security"?2Scott Dorsey
13 Oct 24 ii `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Computer Nerd Kev
11 Oct 24 i`- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Farley Flud
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?5%
11 Oct 24 i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?4candycanearter07
11 Oct 24 i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?3%
11 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2%
14 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1candycanearter07
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?4yeti
12 Oct 24 i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Sn!pe
13 Oct 24 i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2yeti
14 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Sn!pe
14 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?4Sylvia Else
14 Oct 24 i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?3%
14 Oct 24 i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2Sylvia Else
14 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1%
14 Oct 24 `* Re: Security? What "Security"?15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Oct 24  `* Re: Security? What "Security"?14candycanearter07
14 Oct 24   `* Re: Security? What "Security"?13Sn!pe
14 Oct 24    +* Re: Security? What "Security"?6Joel
14 Oct 24    i+- Re: Security? What "Security"?1%
14 Oct 24    i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?4Sn!pe
14 Oct 24    i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Joel
14 Oct 24    i  `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2Sn!pe
15 Oct 24    i   `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Joel
14 Oct 24    `* Re: Security? What "Security"?6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Oct 24     `* Re: Security? What "Security"?5Sn!pe
16 Oct 24      `* Re: Security? What "Security"?4Scott Dorsey
16 Oct 24       `* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Sn!pe
16 Oct 24        `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2candycanearter07
17 Oct 24         `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal