Re: Security? What "Security"?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Security? What "Security"?
De : not (at) *nospam* telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 13. Oct 2024, 20:51:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Message-ID : <670c24a7@news.ausics.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586))
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
Farley Flud  <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
The Intel ME can be disabled in the motherboard BIOS.  Whenever
I build a new machine it is one of the first things that I
disable.
>
No.  The interface that makes the ME visible to the operating system
can be disabled, but the ME is still down there doing whatever
undocumented things it does.  If it wasn't, the processor would never
be able to load the microcode in the first place.

Indeed. Wikipedia summarises potentially more effective ways of
disabling some IME functions using me_cleaner. Installation is
risky though so I haven't tried it myself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine#Disabling_the_ME

--
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Oct 24 * Security? What "Security"?35Sn!pe
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?6John McCue
11 Oct 24 i+- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Sn!pe
11 Oct 24 i+* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Farley Flud
13 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Security? What "Security"?2Scott Dorsey
13 Oct 24 ii `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Computer Nerd Kev
11 Oct 24 i`- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Farley Flud
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?5%
11 Oct 24 i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?4candycanearter07
11 Oct 24 i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?3%
11 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2%
14 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1candycanearter07
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?4yeti
12 Oct 24 i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Sn!pe
13 Oct 24 i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2yeti
14 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Sn!pe
14 Oct 24 +* Re: Security? What "Security"?4Sylvia Else
14 Oct 24 i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?3%
14 Oct 24 i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2Sylvia Else
14 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1%
14 Oct 24 `* Re: Security? What "Security"?15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Oct 24  `* Re: Security? What "Security"?14candycanearter07
14 Oct 24   `* Re: Security? What "Security"?13Sn!pe
14 Oct 24    +* Re: Security? What "Security"?6Joel
14 Oct 24    i+- Re: Security? What "Security"?1%
14 Oct 24    i`* Re: Security? What "Security"?4Sn!pe
14 Oct 24    i `* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Joel
14 Oct 24    i  `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2Sn!pe
15 Oct 24    i   `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Joel
14 Oct 24    `* Re: Security? What "Security"?6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Oct 24     `* Re: Security? What "Security"?5Sn!pe
16 Oct 24      `* Re: Security? What "Security"?4Scott Dorsey
16 Oct 24       `* Re: Security? What "Security"?3Sn!pe
16 Oct 24        `* Re: Security? What "Security"?2candycanearter07
17 Oct 24         `- Re: Security? What "Security"?1Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal