Sujet : Re: Security? What "Security"?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.misc comp.os.linux.advocacy misc.news.internet.discussDate : 14. Oct 2024, 21:37:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <u50rgj9gsr0o40ahv5jigk9v8chunplqks@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 06:18 this Monday (GMT):
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:17:35 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
>
My pet rock Gordon asserts that every networked device has a backdoor.
>
Is Gordon a networked device? How did it communicate that message to you?
A networked rock?
>
Gordon is a primary node on the Extranet but he and I have a direct P2P
telepathic link for a shorter ping.
So, you hated on me for liking trans women, but you're talking about a
rock as if it's alive. OK.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
Security? What "Security"?
Re: Security? What "Security"?
