Sujet : Re: Security? What "Security"?
De : admin (at) *nospam* 127.0.0.1 (Kerr-Mudd, John)
Groupes : comp.misc comp.os.linux.advocacy misc.news.internet.discussDate : 17. Oct 2024, 21:26:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Dis
Message-ID : <20241017212659.94fa337287ca59f87d05cdd9@127.0.0.1>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:10:04 -0000 (UTC)
candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote at 01:03 this Wednesday (GMT):
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
>
Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> wrote:
Of course, he's as solid as a rock; not that we worry about lack
of privacy. As everybody should know, privacy is utterly dead
and security is naught but an illusion.
>
And a rock feels no pain. And an island never cries.
--scott
>
True, that, although Gordon is quite empathetic. To expect
sympathy is going a bit far though, he's seen it all before.
Anyway, he is my rock. ≈:o)
Pet rocks are always cute :)
Petroc is a popular name is some areas.
-- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Security? What "Security"?
Re: Security? What "Security"?
