Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c misc |
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Ah, so probably just setting some keywords in my client and filter based on those. Not a very satisfactory solution.>>
>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote:
>D <nospam@example.net> wrote:>This is the truth! As a thought experiment I sometimes think about>
how I would be able to handle usenet if it had 10x the nr of posts,
and I don't think I would.
Been there, seen that.... Circa 1995 (I forget which groups now) the
text posting volume was so great in the few groups I was following that
it was not possible to keep up. I was always behind, and falling
further behind each day. Eventually the fall behind problem reached a
point where I decided to just drop out. So I disappeared for a good
ten years or so. Of course, when I did return again, Usenet was a
shadow of its former self as far as text posting rates go.
>It would have to be either a laser focus on a very small nr of>
groups, or aggressive filtering of the subject lines.
One did have to do both, and even so, the volume was impossible to keep
up with if the group was at all active.
This is an interesting problem. How is it solved in modern social media?
If by "modern social media" you mean the likes of FB and its ilk,
presumably by having "the algorithm" showing you stuff, and then you
just doom scroll through the algorithm driven feed. And if stuff does
not get put on your feed, you are unaware of its existance.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.