Sujet : Re: big thanks to
De : wagnes (at) *nospam* jemoni.to (Wolfgang Agnes)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmer comp.misc comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.miscSuivi-à : comp.miscDate : 09. Nov 2024, 00:45:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87cyj5xpao.fsf@jemoni.to>
References : 1 2
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
D> On Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:18:52 -0300, Wolfgang Agnes wrote:
>
(*) inetd and xinetd
I did look at the current state of affairs of inetd and xinetd and it
looks like they ignore TLS completely. Perhaps they shouldn't?
>
If you look at the tlswrapper docs, you’ll see that it can be invoked via
inetd (or systemd), and it in turn wraps the actual service process.
That makes sense.
big thanks to
Re: big thanks to