Sujet : Re: the early teletype
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.misc alt.folklore.computersDate : 23. Nov 2024, 23:16:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhtk7u$1s5d5$13@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
On 23 Nov 2024 11:13:32 -0000, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article <vhf1ta$165g7$2@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
On 18 Nov 2024 09:01:47 -0000, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>
It's dying out though because the modern digital modes have much
better performance under marginal conditions.
>
The more efficiently information is encoded, the more it resembles
random noise.
Yes, and I want some of the least efficient encodings for HF, because I
want the highest amount of data to be recovered under poor S/N
conditions. Redundancy is your friend!
There are ways to add redundancy in an optimal fashion, cf Reed-Solomon
codes. The result still looks statistically like noise.
According to John Watkinson, Reed-Solomon codes are theoretically optimum
for this purpose
<
https://www.theregister.com/2013/07/18/data_storage_technology/?page=3>.