Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?
De : mm+usenet-es (at) *nospam* dorfdsl.de (Marco Moock)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 27. Nov 2024, 17:16:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20241127171644.1816de37@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
References : 1
On 27.11.2024 08:44 Uhr Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

 IPv6 is a good case in point where the basic architecture of the
 protocol, namely as an end-to-end address-based datagram
 architecture, has become an imperfect fit for a client-server
 network that makes extensive use of replicated service delivery
 platforms.

I don't see where IPv6 has any disadvantage compared to IPv4 in that
case from a technical view.

Although, IPv4 is exhausted and new companies can't be created like 20
years ago anymore. This might be a reason for some companies to stay
with it.

 Today's network is undertaking a transformation to a name-based
 network, and running out of addresses to the extent that it is no
 longer possible to uniquely address every attached client, is no
 longer the catastrophic event that we once thought it would be. We
 appear to have attached some 30B devices in today's Internet, yet
 in terms of IPv4 use, we have achieved this using a little over 3B
 unique IPv4 addresses visible in the routing system.

The NAT routers at ISPs are sometimes heavily overloaded, many
companies provide IPv6 to reduce the traffic on the NAT machines.


--
kind regards
Marco

Send spam to 1732693447muell@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Nov 24 * [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?19Computer Nerd Kev
27 Nov 24 +* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?17Grant Taylor
27 Nov 24 i`* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?16Richard Kettlewell
28 Nov 24 i `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?15Grant Taylor
28 Nov 24 i  `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?14Richard Kettlewell
28 Nov 24 i   +* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?2Grant Taylor
29 Nov 24 i   i`- Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?1Richard Kettlewell
3 Dec 24 i   `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24 i    `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?10Grant Taylor
4 Dec 24 i     +* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24 i     i`* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?6Grant Taylor
4 Dec 24 i     i `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Dec 24 i     i  `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?4Grant Taylor
5 Dec 24 i     i   +* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Dec 24 i     i   i`- Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?1Grant Taylor
5 Dec 24 i     i   `- Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?1Richard Kettlewell
4 Dec 24 i     `* Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?2Richard Kettlewell
5 Dec 24 i      `- Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?1Grant Taylor
27 Nov 24 `- Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?1Marco Moock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal