Re: terminal only for two weeks

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, yeti wrote:

I use Elinks, Emacs/EWW and W3m, but none of them can replace the scary
fullfat browsers.  They seem to just fit Smolweb stuff (FTP, Gemini,
Gopher and similar).

>
True.

>
I like seeing useful images, so prefer Dillo and Links (the latter
does support display via the framebuffer so you can run it
graphically without X).

>
For some reason, I never managed to get the framebuffer to work. Have no
idea why. =( I would like to get it to work though.

>
I guess the framebuffer is working for the console, otherwise it
will probably be a low-res BIOS character display like in DOS. So
either a permissions problem or do you know that you need to start
Links with the "-g" option?

 
Ahh... ok, that might explain it. If it is console only, then it might not
work in my terminal emulator, and -g just opens a window in X.

Certainly, in X it'll always be in a separate window.

I would have liked for it to shows images in the terminal, but maybe I
need to find another terminal emulator for that to work? I think I use the
default one that comes with xfce.

W3m displays images in XTerm and other terminal emulators, so that
might be what you want for a browser. I'm not sure if there's a
list of terminal emulators that support image display from it.
This page mentions that some require changes to the configuration:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/W3m

--
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#