Re: terminal only for two weeks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: terminal only for two weeks
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 28. Nov 2024, 22:05:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <46a788f2-70e9-af12-1c1c-586881605fb2@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
On Thu, 29 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, yeti wrote:
I use Elinks, Emacs/EWW and W3m, but none of them can replace the scary
fullfat browsers.  They seem to just fit Smolweb stuff (FTP, Gemini,
Gopher and similar).
>
True.
>
I like seeing useful images, so prefer Dillo and Links (the latter
does support display via the framebuffer so you can run it
graphically without X).
>
For some reason, I never managed to get the framebuffer to work. Have no
idea why. =( I would like to get it to work though.
>
I guess the framebuffer is working for the console, otherwise it
will probably be a low-res BIOS character display like in DOS. So
either a permissions problem or do you know that you need to start
Links with the "-g" option?
>
Ahh... ok, that might explain it. If it is console only, then it might not
work in my terminal emulator, and -g just opens a window in X.
>
Certainly, in X it'll always be in a separate window.
>
I would have liked for it to shows images in the terminal, but maybe I
need to find another terminal emulator for that to work? I think I use the
default one that comes with xfce.
>
W3m displays images in XTerm and other terminal emulators, so that
might be what you want for a browser. I'm not sure if there's a
list of terminal emulators that support image display from it.
This page mentions that some require changes to the configuration:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/W3m
I did go back to play with elinks today, and it does seem like the text based browser that gets absolutely closest to what I need with the ability to auto save sessions.
I think that together wish frogfind.com I have found my temporary solution for the terminal! It is also trivial to migrate my open "reading tabs" from firefox to elinks by just doing a save all open tabs, and then massaging the exported bookmarks file a bit and then just open all of the sites from the command line. =)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Nov 24 * terminal only for two weeks45Retrograde
25 Nov 24 +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
25 Nov 24 +* Re: terminal only for two weeks13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 i+* Re: terminal only for two weeks2Mike Spencer
26 Nov 24 ii`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 i+* Re: terminal only for two weeks2yeti
26 Nov 24 ii`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Nov 24 i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks8candycanearter07
30 Nov 24 i +* Re: terminal only for two weeks2yeti
1 Dec 24 i i`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1candycanearter07
30 Nov 24 i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Dec 24 i  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks4candycanearter07
2 Dec 24 i   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24 i    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks2candycanearter07
2 Dec 24 i     `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 +* Re: terminal only for two weeks29John McCue
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks28D
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks27yeti
26 Nov 24 i  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks26D
26 Nov 24 i   +* Re: terminal only for two weeks10Computer Nerd Kev
27 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks9D
27 Nov 24 i   i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks8Computer Nerd Kev
28 Nov 24 i   i  +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1yeti
28 Nov 24 i   i  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks6D
28 Nov 24 i   i   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks5Computer Nerd Kev
28 Nov 24 i   i    +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
29 Nov 24 i   i    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks3yeti
29 Nov 24 i   i     `* Re: terminal only for two weeks2D
29 Nov 24 i   i      `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
26 Nov 24 i   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks15Mike Spencer
27 Nov 24 i    +* Re: terminal only for two weeks7D
28 Nov 24 i    i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks6Mike Spencer
28 Nov 24 i    i +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Nov 24 i    i +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
20 Dec19:42 i    i `* URIs within URIs: google.com/url?q= et al.3Ivan Shmakov
20 Dec20:03 i    i  +- Re: URIs within URIs: google.com/url?q= et al.1Andy Burns
22 Dec06:39 i    i  `- Re: URIs within URIs: google.com/url?q= et al.1Mike Spencer
4 Dec 24 i    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks7Oregonian Haruspex
4 Dec 24 i     `* Re: terminal only for two weeks6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24 i      `* Re: terminal only for two weeks5candycanearter07
5 Dec 24 i       +* Re: terminal only for two weeks3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Dec 24 i       i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks2Computer Nerd Kev
8 Dec 24 i       i `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1root
5 Dec 24 i       `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1yeti
28 Nov 24 `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Anssi Saari

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal