Re: web

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: web
De : news (at) *nospam* zzo38computer.org.invalid
Groupes : comp.infosystems comp.misc
Date : 20. Jan 2025, 20:23:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1737333707.bystand@zzo38computer.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : bystand/1.3.0pre1
yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> wrote:
When browsers appeared, we thought of the web as what was accessible
by them.  FTP, HTTP and Gopher were among this in the early days.

Many browsers can also display local files (which is not internet), and
many newer ones can display PDF files (whether or not they are accessed
by the internet), too, though.

Today's big$$$-browsers converge to single protocol network file viewers
and unluckily the smallweb browsers do too.

Some of the small web browsers do support multiple protocols and multiple
file formats. Unfortunately the major web browsers do not support such
things very well even if you add extensions, though; and they have many
other problems too other than just this, anyways.

Let's prefer multi protocol browsers and return to all goof stuff being
just a click away from each.
 
That was what the web was meant to be and we should make it exactly that
again.
 
First step: Prefer writing plugins for existing browsers over creating
more single protocol file viewers.

I think that it should be done, although you can still make up new browsers
that may support such plugins too. I also think that the protocols and the
file formats should be handled separately, so there will be one plugin for
Gemini protocol and one plugin for Gemini file format (although they will
probably be a part of the same package, since they are used together), and
one plugin for Spartan protocol (which also uses Gemini file format so you
do not need a separate plugin for Spartan file format), etc.

--
Don't laugh at the moon when it is day time in France.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Nov 24 * terminal only for two weeks85Retrograde
25 Nov 24 +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
25 Nov 24 +* Re: terminal only for two weeks13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 i+* Re: terminal only for two weeks2Mike Spencer
26 Nov 24 ii`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 i+* Re: terminal only for two weeks2yeti
26 Nov 24 ii`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Nov 24 i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks8candycanearter07
30 Nov 24 i +* Re: terminal only for two weeks2yeti
1 Dec 24 i i`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1candycanearter07
30 Nov 24 i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Dec 24 i  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks4candycanearter07
2 Dec 24 i   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24 i    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks2candycanearter07
2 Dec 24 i     `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 +* Re: terminal only for two weeks51John McCue
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks50D
26 Nov 24 i +* Re: terminal only for two weeks48yeti
26 Nov 24 i i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks47D
26 Nov 24 i i +* Re: terminal only for two weeks10Computer Nerd Kev
27 Nov 24 i i i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks9D
27 Nov 24 i i i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks8Computer Nerd Kev
28 Nov 24 i i i  +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1yeti
28 Nov 24 i i i  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks6D
28 Nov 24 i i i   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks5Computer Nerd Kev
28 Nov 24 i i i    +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
29 Nov 24 i i i    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks3yeti
29 Nov 24 i i i     `* Re: terminal only for two weeks2D
29 Nov 24 i i i      `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
26 Nov 24 i i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks36Mike Spencer
27 Nov 24 i i  +* Re: terminal only for two weeks7D
28 Nov 24 i i  i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks6Mike Spencer
28 Nov 24 i i  i +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Nov 24 i i  i +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
20 Dec 24 i i  i `* URIs within URIs: google.com/url?q= et al.3Ivan Shmakov
20 Dec 24 i i  i  +- Re: URIs within URIs: google.com/url?q= et al.1Andy Burns
22 Dec 24 i i  i  `- Re: URIs within URIs: google.com/url?q= et al.1Mike Spencer
4 Dec 24 i i  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks28Oregonian Haruspex
4 Dec 24 i i   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24 i i    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks26candycanearter07
5 Dec 24 i i     +* Re: terminal only for two weeks23Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Dec 24 i i     i`* Re: terminal only for two weeks22Computer Nerd Kev
8 Dec 24 i i     i `* Re: terminal only for two weeks21root
13 Jan 25 i i     i  +* Re: terminal only for two weeks19Bozo User
13 Jan 25 i i     i  i+* Re: terminal only for two weeks3D
13 Jan 25 i i     i  ii`* Re: terminal only for two weeks2Computer Nerd Kev
14 Jan 25 i i     i  ii `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
16 Jan 25 i i     i  i`* web15Ivan Shmakov
16 Jan 25 i i     i  i `* Re: web14Computer Nerd Kev
17 Jan 25 i i     i  i  +* Re: web2yeti
22 Mar 25 i i     i  i  i`- Re: web1anthk
18 Jan 25 i i     i  i  `* Re: web11Ivan Shmakov
19 Jan 25 i i     i  i   +* Re: web3Computer Nerd Kev
29 Jan 25 i i     i  i   i`* Re: web2candycanearter07
4 Feb 25 i i     i  i   i `- Re: web1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Jan 25 i i     i  i   `* Re: web7Ben Collver
19 Jan 25 i i     i  i    `* Re: web6yeti
19 Jan 25 i i     i  i     +- Re: web1Sn!pe
19 Jan 25 i i     i  i     +- Re: web1Ivan Shmakov
20 Jan 25 i i     i  i     +* Re: web2Ben Collver
24 Jan 25 i i     i  i     i`- Re: web1Ivan Shmakov
20 Jan 25 i i     i  i     `- Re: web1news
13 Jan 25 i i     i  `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Bozo User
5 Dec 24 i i     `* Re: terminal only for two weeks2yeti
16 Jan 25 i i      `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1yeti
22 Mar 25 i `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1anthk
28 Nov 24 +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Anssi Saari
13 Jan 25 `* Re: terminal only for two weeks18Bozo User
13 Jan 25  `* Re: terminal only for two weeks17Salvador Mirzo
13 Jan 25   `* Re: terminal only for two weeks16D
13 Jan 25    `* Re: terminal only for two weeks15Salvador Mirzo
14 Jan 25     +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1D
16 Jan 25     `* Re: terminal only for two weeks13Salvador Mirzo
16 Jan 25      +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Rich
16 Jan 25      +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Computer Nerd Kev
21 Jan 25      +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Jan 25      `* Re: terminal only for two weeks9Ivan Shmakov
12 Feb 25       `* Re: terminal only for two weeks8Salvador Mirzo
16 Feb 25        `* Re: terminal only for two weeks7Jerry Peters
17 Feb 25         `* Re: terminal only for two weeks6Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25          +- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25          +* Re: terminal only for two weeks2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Feb 25          i`- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25          `* Re: terminal only for two weeks2Scott Dorsey
19 Feb 25           `- Re: terminal only for two weeks1Salvador Mirzo

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal