Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 24. Jan 2025, 00:54:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmukqo$1s5se$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:16:38 -0000 (UTC), Ben Collver wrote:

Instead of relying on generic compression techniques, he took advantage
of the properties of the data and developed a compression algorithm that
came within 0.03 bits of the theoretical limit of possible compression.
To this day, it remains unbeaten.

All of which only worked for the English language (US).

What happened when they had to support other languages?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jan 25 * How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM10Ben Collver
24 Jan 25 +* Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Jan 25 i`* Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM6Eli the Bearded
24 Jan 25 i `* Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Jan 25 i  `* Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM4Anton Shepelev
24 Jan 25 i   +- Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM1Anton Shepelev
25 Jan 25 i   `* Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Jan 25 i    `- Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM1Anton Shepelev
25 Jan 25 `* Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM2Salvador Mirzo
3 Feb 25  `- Re: How Unix Spell Ran in 64kB RAM1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal