Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''
De : jmccue (at) *nospam* qball.jmcunx.com (John McCue)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 12. Feb 2025, 02:17:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vogss1$21546$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (OpenBSD/7.6 (amd64))
Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> wrote:
Meta laid off 5% of its workforce, calling them ?low performers.?
<snip>

As he wrote on LinkedIn, his five-year history with the
company included several ?exceeds expectations? ratings and
a promotion.
<snip>

Seems to me they are taking a page from the IBM playbook.
I suspect the people being paid a lot and/or over 40.  With
the Trump Administration, we know there will be more of
these firings because discrimination of all kinds is now
fully legal.  So, Companies can fire people all people over
a certain age or race without worrying about consequences.

 
Source:
<https://www.fastcompany.com/91276893/meta-laid-off-low-performers-defend-themselves-on-linkedin-and-reddit>

--
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
                        - Paraphrasing Star Wars

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Feb 25 * Meta lays-off ``low performers''9Salvador Mirzo
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''8John McCue
13 Feb 25  +* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''5Scott Dorsey
13 Feb 25  i`* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''3Eli the Bearded
14 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i   `- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Eli the Bearded
15 Feb 25  +- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Anonymous
16 Feb 25  `- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Retrograde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal