Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''
De : kludge (at) *nospam* panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 13. Feb 2025, 15:26:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID : <vokvfa$8lh$1@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2
John McCue  <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:
Seems to me they are taking a page from the IBM playbook.
I suspect the people being paid a lot and/or over 40.  With
the Trump Administration, we know there will be more of
these firings because discrimination of all kinds is now
fully legal.  So, Companies can fire people all people over
a certain age or race without worrying about consequences.

And note that doing this was absolutely disastrous to IBM, as it
has been every time it's been tried in private industry.

A good friend of mine worked for a company where they fired all
of the higher-paid technical workers, including the guy who owned
the patents for their process.  That didn't go well.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Feb 25 * Meta lays-off ``low performers''9Salvador Mirzo
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''8John McCue
13 Feb 25  +* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''5Scott Dorsey
13 Feb 25  i`* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''3Eli the Bearded
14 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i   `- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Eli the Bearded
15 Feb 25  +- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Anonymous
16 Feb 25  `- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Retrograde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal