Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''
De : fungus (at) *nospam* amongus.com.invalid (Retrograde)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 16. Feb 2025, 17:28:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <67b2124b$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-02-12, John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> wrote:
Seems to me they are taking a page from the IBM playbook.
I suspect the people being paid a lot and/or over 40.  With
the Trump Administration, we know there will be more of

I think he's just doing what Musk does to the Federal govt, trying to
show he's on the side of the Trump admin.  Pretty spineless/weasely, but
it's zuckerdouche we're talking about.  Remember they banned Trump at
one point and are almost certainly on his shit list, only inches away
from a total ban.

Low performers - go fuck yourself, Zuck. Your website sucks.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Feb 25 * Meta lays-off ``low performers''9Salvador Mirzo
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''8John McCue
13 Feb 25  +* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''5Scott Dorsey
13 Feb 25  i`* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''3Eli the Bearded
14 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i   `- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Eli the Bearded
15 Feb 25  +- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Anonymous
16 Feb 25  `- Re: Meta lays-off ``low performers''1Retrograde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal