Re: broken schools

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: broken schools
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 09. Mar 2025, 00:14:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <0c615f3f-d454-fbca-126b-06b270ff9437@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Salvador Mirzo wrote:

Thank you! Very interesting, I had no idea!
>
An excellent reference to how it got where it is is
>
 United States Penetration of Brazil
 Jan Knippers Black,
 University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977
 ISBN 0-8122-7720-1.
Thank you for the recommendation. Sadly I do not think my schedule allows it at
the moment, I have way too many philosophical topics on my plate at the moment.
=(

You're quite right.  It is indeed *very* distracting.  In fact,
observing such things has given the conclusion that visual stimili (at
least in myself) is a really strong physiological thing: it seems quite
>
I also imagine that in south america it is still fashionable for women to be
women, and that women are feminine? I hope so... I like that!
>
Lol.  A declaration like that won't get much support around here. :)
We're living in a globalized world.  Even news casters now use words
like ``spoiler''.  Literally---no translation needed.  My geography
teachers in elementary school now seem like prophets.
What!?! Please don't spoil my dreams of travelling to Brazil meeting loads of
beautiful brazilian women who would be naturally interested in a swede with blue
eyes! ;)

stronger than any will power.  I started out reading at the beach so I
would have something to do there, staying longer in the sun.  So my slow
reading doesn't defeat that purpose.  I also often go during week days,
when the beach is not crowded with people.  It worked out so well that
>
Aha... so that's how you get any work done! I imagine if you would go during
beach rush hour, you'd not get a lot of things done. ;)
>
Lol.  You're quite right.  One thing that's happening is that I'm a very
approachable person and being there nearly every day brings new friends.
Now every now then there appears someone to chat.  I feel unable to tell
anyone to go away, even because---when people approach for chat---it's
evidently the case that they're in need of something.  (They might also
think that I'm killing time.)  I never really tell them to go away.
That doesn't help the work much.  Nevertheless, one of my deadlines got
extended by a week and so I was able to get a project's phase done---I'm
on time!
Amazing! You couldn't get further from the swedish folk psyche. In sweden two
people could sit next to each other for years, and at most nod to each other.
Maybe after a year or two, a small conversation might start.
In the subway, no one talks to each other. People mainstain silence and look at
their phones. Only people who know each other talk on the subway. Definitely not
strangers.

it seems to work like a second phase of my work schedule.  I write in
the morning and read in the afternoon, intermixed with walking,
swimming and biking.  I cannot do it *every* day because I need to
[be] ``the office'' some days.
>
Sounds like you have a very nice job there!
>
It's my favorite ever.  My at-the-office phase restarts in two weeks.
Ouch! Hopefully it will not last too long!

And what about beef? I heard there are wars in south america over
whether argentina or brazil has the best beef? Who is right?
>
I never quite heard of wars, but surely Argentina is known as one of the
best bovine meat producers.  And so in Brazil's south.  Historically,
they have a lot of tradition (and still do).  So Argentina or not, it's
that whole region, going beyond Brazil and Argentina.
>
As a teenager (with my family), I traveled once to a beach place in the
state of Rio de Janeiro and one thing got stuck in my memory about a
dinner we had an Argentine restaurant.  The (small) place was run by the
owner himself, who was an Argentine.  The meat was unforgettable.
Brazil's south is known as people who know how to barbeque like no one.
I'm sure the same applies to the Argentines.
Another dream! Except for the women, above, I dream of going to brazil and
argentina for a beef and bbq safari! This would be excellent! Maybe I would
never leave again? =)

But I consider coffee---no matter how good quality if might be---a drug
to be totally kept on a leash.  I don't think we should make regular use
of any stimulants---of any drug at all.
>
Ahh... and here I drink between 0.5 and 0.7 liters per day! ;)
>
That's a huge quantity.
Really? Just regular coffee. No espresso! ;)

But I don't have to drink it... from time to time I just stop when I
get tired of it and move to tea instead, and never experience any
negative withdrawal symptoms. My favourite tea is Lapsang.
>
If you don't completely, then at least stop as you already do but then
don't substitute it for tea or any other caffeine or theobromine intake
(such as cocoa products like chocolate).  Let your system rest from
these substances.  The less you take in, the more tolerant you become.
The more you do, the less you get.
Interesting experiment! I've tried it due to chance a couple of times, but then
I get so tired in the evening, so I won't get as much quality computer time in
when the wife sleeps. ;)

I am probably a naturalist.  If coffee ``accelerates your physiology'',
then we can say that such ``speed'' is not the natural way of your body.
If you do it every day, you're totally not respecting the natural way of
the system.  Not a religious thing at all---recall that perspective I
had on tattoos.  So this is another illustration of why I find myself
more religious than the vast number of very religious people I've ever
met.
>
Well, maybe principled? I think religious has many supernatural connotations
that I find nto so good to mix up in these kinds of discussions.
>
``Principled'' it is.  Words don't really matter.  We need them here,
but they're just the tags on the pointers.  Remember Juliet?  ``What's
in a name?''
Amen!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy284Retrograde
16 Feb 25 `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy283D
17 Feb 25  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy282Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy281D
17 Feb 25    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy73Adrian
17 Feb 25    i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy72D
18 Feb 25    i +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy47Adrian
18 Feb 25    i i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15Sn!pe
18 Feb 25    i ii+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy12D
20 Feb 25    i iii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy11Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5Sn!pe
20 Feb 25    i iii i+- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3Scott Dorsey
21 Feb 25    i iii i +- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i iii i `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
20 Feb 25    i iii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5D
20 Feb 25    i iii  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy4Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3D
21 Feb 25    i iii    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i iii     `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
18 Feb 25    i ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Adrian
20 Feb 25    i ii `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
18 Feb 25    i i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy25D
18 Feb 25    i ii+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy18Adrian
20 Feb 25    i iii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy17Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy16D
20 Feb 25    i iii  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i iii   +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3Sn!pe
21 Feb 25    i iii   i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i iii   i `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
21 Feb 25    i iii   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy11D
24 Feb 25    i iii    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25    i iii    i`- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
25 Feb 25    i iii    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy8Anton Shepelev
25 Feb 25    i iii     `* small communities, nntp server (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)7Salvador Mirzo
26 Feb 25    i iii      +* Re: small communities, nntp server (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)3D
27 Feb 25    i iii      i`* Re: small communities, nntp server2Salvador Mirzo
27 Feb 25    i iii      i `- Re: small communities, nntp server1D
26 Feb 25    i iii      `* Re: small communities, nntp server3yeti
26 Feb 25    i iii       +- Re: small communities, nntp server1D
26 Feb 25    i iii       `- Re: small communities, nntp server1D
20 Feb 25    i ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy6Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i ii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5D
20 Feb 25    i ii  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy4Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i ii   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3D
21 Feb 25    i ii    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i ii     `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
20 Feb 25    i i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy6Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy5Scott Dorsey
21 Feb 25    i i  +- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i i  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy3D
22 Feb 25    i i   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Scott Dorsey
23 Feb 25    i i    `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
20 Feb 25    i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy24Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy23D
20 Feb 25    i   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy22Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25    i    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy21D
21 Feb 25    i     `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy20Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25    i      `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy19D
24 Feb 25    i       `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy18Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25    i        `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy17D
24 Feb 25    i         `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy16Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25    i          `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15D
25 Feb 25    i           +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy12Salvador Mirzo
25 Feb 25    i           i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy11D
25 Feb 25    i           i `* OT: personal stories (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)10Salvador Mirzo
26 Feb 25    i           i  `* Re: OT: personal stories (Was: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy)9D
27 Feb 25    i           i   `* Re: OT: personal stories8Salvador Mirzo
27 Feb 25    i           i    `* Re: OT: personal stories7D
8 Mar 25    i           i     `* Re: OT: personal stories6Salvador Mirzo
8 Mar 25    i           i      +* Re: OT: personal stories2yeti
8 Mar 25    i           i      i`- Re: OT: personal stories1D
8 Mar 25    i           i      `* Re: OT: personal stories3D
9 Mar 25    i           i       `* Re: OT: personal stories2Salvador Mirzo
9 Mar 25    i           i        `- Re: OT: personal stories1D
25 Feb 25    i           `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2D Finnigan
27 Feb 25    i            `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
17 Feb 25    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy207D
17 Feb 25     +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Scott Dorsey
18 Feb 25     i`- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
18 Feb 25     `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy204Computer Nerd Kev
19 Feb 25      +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy160Eli the Bearded
19 Feb 25      i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy4D
6 Mar 25      ii+- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Ivan Shmakov
8 Mar 25      ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo
8 Mar 25      ii `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1D
19 Feb 25      i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy155Computer Nerd Kev
20 Feb 25      i +- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25      i +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy152D
20 Feb 25      i i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy151Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25      i i +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy95Salvador Mirzo
20 Feb 25      i i i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy94D
21 Feb 25      i i i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy93Salvador Mirzo
21 Feb 25      i i i  `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy92D
24 Feb 25      i i i   `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy91Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25      i i i    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Rich
24 Feb 25      i i i    i`- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25      i i i    +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy30D
24 Feb 25      i i i    i+* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy14Salvador Mirzo
24 Feb 25      i i i    ii`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy13D
25 Feb 25      i i i    ii `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy12Rich
24 Feb 25      i i i    i`* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy15Rich
26 Feb 25      i i i    `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy58Scott Dorsey
20 Feb 25      i i `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy55D
4 Mar 25      i `- Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy1Eli the Bearded
19 Feb 25      +* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy41D
20 Feb 25      `* Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy2Salvador Mirzo

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal