Sujet : Re: Derivative Licensing Question
De : ram (at) *nospam* zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 22. Mar 2025, 10:26:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Stefan Ram
Message-ID : <copyright-20250322102032@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References : 1
mm0fmf <
none@invalid.com> wrote or quoted:
If I take the source and clone the functions so they have the same
prototypes but write them in assembler and have the same flow, is this a
derivative work? Or is the assembler version my work to licence how I
feel?
"Writing them in assembler with the same flow" might be nothing
more than compiling and disassembling.
You also could ask an AI chatbot to write code for you.
AFAIK this can be used by you as if it was not coprighted.
I sometimes wonder about copright when you copy and then
change. Say, you copy this copyrighted program:
A = 2
. (It's too short to be copyrighted, but it serves here to
represent a much longer piece of code.) You make a little
change to it:
B = 2
. Later you change it into:
B = 7
. Now your program clearly has nothing to do with the original
anymore. You just used that to get started but then gradually
transformed it into your own code. So, is "B = 7" now free from
any copyright of the original author of "A = 2"? At what point
during the transition exactly did the copyright disappear?