Re: On Binary Digits

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: On Binary Digits
De : dnomhcir (at) *nospam* gmx.com (Richmond)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 01. Apr 2025, 17:35:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Frantic
Message-ID : <86v7rnj0vn.fsf@example.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> writes:

To cope with this problem some workers have devised their own
conventions of writing and pronouncing such numbers. A system in use
at the Bell Telephone Laboratories would set off the above figure in
groups of three digits:
>
    11,110,101,000
>
and would then pronounce each group of three (or less) separately as
its decimal equivalent. The first binary group, 11, is the equivalent
of the decimal 3; the second, 110, of the decimal 6; the third, 101,
of the decimal 5. (000 is zero in any notation.) The above would then
be read, "Three, six, five, zero."

This is called Octal, is it not.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * On Binary Digits17Ben Collver
1 Apr 25 +- Re: On Binary Digits1Stefan Ram
1 Apr 25 +* Re: On Binary Digits9Richmond
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: On Binary Digits8Ben Collver
2 Apr 25 i +* Re: On Binary Digits5Aharon Robbins
2 Apr 25 i i+- Re: On Binary Digits1Bob Eager
4 Apr 25 i i`* Re: On Binary Digits3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 May 25 i i `* Re: On Binary Digits2anthk
12 May 25 i i  `- Re: On Binary Digits1Richmond
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: On Binary Digits2Bob Eager
3 Apr 25 i  `- Re: On Binary Digits1Anton Shepelev
1 Apr 25 +- Re: On Binary Digits1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Apr 25 `* Re: On Binary Digits5vallor
3 Apr 25  `* Re: On Binary Digits4Sn!pe
3 Apr 25   +- Re: On Binary Digits1Scott Dorsey
4 Apr 25   `* Re: On Binary Digits2vallor
4 Apr 25    `- Re: On Binary Digits1Sn!pe

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal