Re: On Binary Digits

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c misc 
Sujet : Re: On Binary Digits
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.misc
Date : 01. Apr 2025, 23:31:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vshpgb$6sd5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:58:47 -0000 (UTC), Ben Collver wrote:

It may be considered that there is an impropriety in using a term
borrowed from decimal notation to indicate binary magnitudes.

Tell us about it. Look at the stubborn ones who still say “kilo” (K),
“mega” (M), “giga” (G), “tera” (T), ”peta” (P) etc when they mean “kibi”
(Ki), “mebi” (Mi), “gibi” (Gi), “tebi” (Ti), “pebi” (Pi) etc.

On the other hand, I once heard the name “kabillion” used for 2**30.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * On Binary Digits17Ben Collver
1 Apr 25 +- Re: On Binary Digits1Stefan Ram
1 Apr 25 +* Re: On Binary Digits9Richmond
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: On Binary Digits8Ben Collver
2 Apr 25 i +* Re: On Binary Digits5Aharon Robbins
2 Apr 25 i i+- Re: On Binary Digits1Bob Eager
4 Apr 25 i i`* Re: On Binary Digits3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 May 25 i i `* Re: On Binary Digits2anthk
12 May 25 i i  `- Re: On Binary Digits1Richmond
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: On Binary Digits2Bob Eager
3 Apr 25 i  `- Re: On Binary Digits1Anton Shepelev
1 Apr 25 +- Re: On Binary Digits1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Apr 25 `* Re: On Binary Digits5vallor
3 Apr 25  `* Re: On Binary Digits4Sn!pe
3 Apr 25   +- Re: On Binary Digits1Scott Dorsey
4 Apr 25   `* Re: On Binary Digits2vallor
4 Apr 25    `- Re: On Binary Digits1Sn!pe

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal