Sujet : Re: On Binary Digits
De : news0009 (at) *nospam* eager.cx (Bob Eager)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 02. Apr 2025, 21:41:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m55lonFl2gtU3@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:37:49 +0000, Ben Collver wrote:
On 2025-04-01, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> writes:
>
To cope with this problem some workers have devised their own
conventions of writing and pronouncing such numbers. A system in use
at the Bell Telephone Laboratories would set off the above figure in
groups of three digits:
>
11,110,101,000
>
and would then pronounce each group of three (or less) separately as
its decimal equivalent. The first binary group, 11, is the equivalent
of the decimal 3; the second, 110, of the decimal 6; the third, 101,
of the decimal 5. (000 is zero in any notation.) The above would then
be read, "Three, six, five, zero."
>
This is called Octal, is it not.
Yes this is called Octal. I only recall using octal in two places:
C escape sequences (\033) and Unix file mode bits (755), both
coincidentally from Bell.
I still use octal when using the chmod command, as I never learned the
syntax of the alternative. All the bit meanings are burned into my brain.
-- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org