Sujet : Re: Truly Random Numbers On A Quantum Computer??
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 04. Apr 2025, 20:05:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vspah1$75m8$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 10:31:59 -0300, Ethan Carter wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
On 30 Mar 2025 14:32:46 GMT, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
|In spite of its superficial appeal, the limit frequency
|interpretation has been widely discarded, primarily because there |is
no assurance that the above limit really exists for the actual
|sequences of events to which one wishes to apply probability |theory.
|
"Quantum Mechanics" (1998) - Leslie E. Ballentine
>
Discarded or not, it’s the definition used in gambling. In other words,
people literally bet money on it.
Discarded in its theoretical use, which is where the discussion is. I
think nearly nobody disputes how useful the limit-frequency
interpretation is.
“The difference between theory and practice is, in theory there is no
difference, but in practice there is.”
I wonder who said that ... ?
Truly Random Numbers On A Quantum Computer??
Re: Truly Random Numbers On A Quantum Computer??