Re: People Are Googling Fake Sayings To See AI Overviews Explain Them

Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes:

Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> writes: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> writes: >> Try it yourself. I put in “you can't make
avocado without breaking >> legs”, and it came back with some
paragraphs that began

>
Is this a case of rubbish in, rubbish out? or ask a silly question,
get a silly answer.
>
ChatGPT, by its own admission, holds up a mirror.

>
I think a persistent bluffer is a good model for it. Sometimes right
by luck, but very much not reliable for anything that matters.
>
Most recently AI slop has created a new kind of supply chain attack:
>
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ai-hallucinated-code-dependencies-become-new-supply-chain-risk/

Well I guess they didn't have a code review. Even human beings get it
wrong. I see GPT is well down the list.