Sujet : Re: Wondering ...
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.miscDate : 27. Apr 2025, 07:00:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrn100rhr6.1bloo.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Jim Jackson <
jj@franjam.org.uk> wrote at 17:32 this Friday (GMT):
On 2025-04-22, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 21:00:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 08:00 this Monday (GMT):
>
... if anybody ever referred to XML as ???Echh Smell??? ...
I'm sure someone has, but that feels wrong to me.
>
The musing was prompted by some who feel JSON is the bee???s knees, and who
look on XML as, shall we say, Old Skool ...
>
XML old skool!!!!!?????
>
Bloody 'ell, does that make me pre-historic in prefering csv text files :-)
Being old doesn't mean it's bad :D
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Wondering ...
Re: Wondering ...
